First Attempt To Launch The Scorpius SR-S
Torrance, California
November 20, 1995
|
|
Microcosm announced today a successful 200 second test
firing of its 5,000 lb thrust Scorpius ultra-low-cost
engine. According to Microcosm President, Dr. James
Wertz, "The 200 second burn represents a major
milestone in low cost launch vehicles. It shows that
engines costing less than $1/lb of thrust can have
sufficient life to support both sounding rocket and
launch vehicle applications." The engine design
successfully tested will be used in sub-orbital sounding
rockets and the Liberty Light-Lift Launch Vehicle
designed to put 2,200 lbs into low Earth orbit for $1.7
million. The 200 second burn was achieved on the sixth
engine produced. It was the first engine designed to have
the full required life. The test took place at the
Energetic Materials Research Test Center, EMRTC, in
Socorro, NM, which began testing Scorpius liquid engines
with a "ribbon-burning" ceremony in August. The
test firing was directed by Ken Mason.
|
|
The engine development is a key component of the
Microcosm Scorpius Low Cost Launch Vehicle program which
is intended to reduce near-term launch costs by more than
a factor of 10. Work to date has been funded through a
series of contracts with the U.S. Air Force Phillips
Laboratory. The Scorpius concept was developed by Ed
Keith. Scorpius Program Manager, Bob Conger said "We
are very appreciative of the excellent testing work done
by EMRTC, and of Utah Rocketry which fabricates the
Scorpius engines." According to Wertz, "The
technology development is proceeding extremely well.
However, funding is far less certain because of the very
severe budget constraints. Nonetheless, the entire
Scorpius vehicle family through medium lift can be
developed for less than $100 million, which is
substantially less than the cost of two medium-lift
launches. Its successful development would provide
estimated savings of approximately $100 million per month
in U.S. launch costs."
|
|
The Scorpius kerosene/liquid oxygen engine is made of
composite material. It is pressure fed, ablatively
cooled, and far simpler in design than traditional liquid
rocket engines. The engine tested has only 18 parts,
compared to approximately 15,000 parts in a typical
liquid-fueled rocket engine according to an OTA
assessment. It takes less than a man-week to fabricate
the engine from raw materials. This represents a
reduction in cost of more than a factor of 100 over
traditional engines of comparable size and performance.
|